Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays Uses Her Opponent’s “IME” Report

Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays Uses Her Opponent’s “IME” Report

The mark of a good attorney is when she finds a way to use her opponent’s evidence against them. August 2024 brought Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays’ client K.K. (initials used to preserve client’s anonymity) a successful settlement by intimidating opposing counsel with his own medical expert’s report.

KK worked for a machine fabricator which required him to repeatedly lift 50-pound parts when fabricating grain shoots. From July 23 thru July 26, 2022, KK was tasked to repeatedly bend at the waist from floor to chest to lift, load, and unload heavy parts into a machine. In doing so, he felt a pop and pain sensation in his low back with ongoing throbbing pain. Realizing that this was more than a pulled muscle, KK promptly informed his supervisor of his pain who instructed him to go home to rest, apply ice, and medicate. The next day, KK had worsening pain, so he went to urgent care and then follow-up with his primary doctor. He was prescribed strong pain medication and physical therapy. Despite weeks of therapy, KK had no improvement so his doctor ordered MRI imaging of his spinal cord in October 2022. The 2022 MRI showed a disk herniation in his low back requiring surgery. The surgery was performed in July 2023.

Before the disk herniation discovery, the workers compensation carrier accepted responsibility for the claim, meaning they were paying workers compensation benefits and agreed that the injury occurred at work. However, once the insurance carrier got notice that an MRI showed a serious disk herniation, they scheduled KK for a medical examination with a doctor of their choosing. The insurance carrier self-named this examination an “independent medical examination,” however nothing could be further from the truth as such examinations are far from independent, complete or even honest.

The so-called Independent Medical Examiner met with KK only once in April 2023 and from that he declared that his work-injury was no more than a lumbar strain and that all he needed was a four-week course of physical therapy.  With this, all benefits were denied, and KK was left to fend for himself in terms of his finances and medical treatment expenses.  This was devastating for KK and his family; KK had never suffered pre-existing issues with any part of his back.  He did everything his employer asked of him repeatedly, over days, lifting heavy 50-pound material causing injury.  He reported his injury immediately, sought medical treatment, and tried everything to get better.  When he became too expensive with an upcoming surgery, the workers compensation carrier found a hack doctor to deny his claim arguing that he suffered no more than a strain when an MRI indicated a disk herniation.

With the insurance denial, KK was forced to find legal counsel to fight for him.  He contacted Mays Law Office and hired Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays in May 2023 before his July 2023 surgery.  The surgery was successful, and the surgical findings were consistent with the MRI for a disk herniation.  KK was able to return to work and is now working without restrictions.

Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays filed an appeal with the State for the workers compensation insurance carrier’s denial of benefits.  A hearing was scheduled for August 1, 2024.  Before this hearing, the insurance company expressed interest in settlement.  Attorney Pierobon Mays responded that while Client KK would be interested in settlement short of going to hearing, the settlement monies would have to be enticing if the insurance carrier wanted a closed file.  Attorney Pierobon Mays told opposing counsel that she would not discount the claim too much as she felt confident that she would win the claim at hearing.  Attorney Pierobon Mays noted to opposing counsel that the report of their doctor was poor.  First, the report pre-dated the July 2023 surgery, so it was missing any discussion of the July 2023 surgery and the surgical findings which proved that KK suffered more than a lumbar strain, and in fact had a disk herniation with stenosis.  So, the surgical findings substantiated the seriousness of the work injury and undermined the credibility of the insurance doctor.  Moreover, remember the insurance company’s doctor accepted that an injury had occurred at work and that physical therapy was necessary with a period of healing and restricted work.   Yet, the insurance carrier never paid the therapy bills nor did they pay KK a lost time benefit while he was unable to work without restriction.  Failure by an insurance company to pay conceded benefits is illegal in Wisconsin under our Workers Compensation Act.  Attorney Pierobon Mays made it clear to opposing counsel that, if a successful settlement was not reached prior to the August hearing then she would file a penalty claim (awardable up to $30,000) for failing to pay a conceded/undenied benefit.  Opposing counsel fought back very little because he knew that he was trapped due to the poor handling of the claim and the facts and evidence were in favor of a win for KK.

KK‘s workers compensation injury claim was settled before the hearing giving KK more money in his pocket than if he had gone to hearing and won!  Moreover, the insurance carrier was responsible for paying back the private health carrier and a large portion of the unpaid medical expense.  KK was very happy with the results that Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays got for him.  He avoided having to testify at a hearing, got more money in his pocket, and did not have to worry about past medical treatment expense.  He has returned to work with no residual symptoms from his back injury and working without restriction.

Mays Law Office is proud to announce another successful representation and result for a Wisconsin injured worker who recovered workers compensation benefits.  Feeling frustrated too?  Call Mays Law Office at 608)291-9402.  Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays is only a call away for a free consultation to answer all your questions

OWI Diversion in Wisconsin: Avoiding a Conviction Without Going to Trial

OWI Diversion in Wisconsin: Avoiding a Conviction Without Going to Trial

If you have been arrested for drunk driving in Wisconsin, the best-case scenario is to get your operating while intoxicated (OWI) charge dismissed without going to trial. Getting your charge dismissed will allow you to avoid the life-altering consequences of an OWI conviction, and getting it dismissed without going to trial will save you time, money, and stress.

Is this outcome too good to be true?

In many cases, the answer is “No.” Not only are there ways to fight your OWI charge before your trial date arrives, but diversion is also an option for many first-time offenders.

What is “Diversion” in a Wisconsin OWI Case?

The Wisconsin Courts have established several diversion programs that allow first-time offenders to avoid the life-altering consequences of a conviction. While each program has different eligibility criteria and requirements, it generally functions the same way.

When you enter one of these programs, your case is “diverted” from trial. This means your case is taken off of the court’s docket during your participation. Your case will be dismissed if you fully participate in the program and complete its requirements successfully. You will not have to go to trial and will not have an OWI conviction on your record.

As a result, seeking diversion is a good option for eligible first-time offenders who do not have substantial grounds to fight their OWI charges. To qualify for diversion, you do not need to have a defense to your OWI charge. Even if there is no question that you were driving under the influence, you may still be eligible to enroll.

What to Expect if You Enroll in an OWI Diversion Program

Let’s say you are eligible for diversion, and let’s say you decide to enroll. What can you expect from this point forward?

Generally, participating in an OWI diversion program involves completing specific requirements while ensuring you stay out of trouble. In this way, it is somewhat similar to being on probation. However, while probation violations can lead to jail time, failing to complete a diversion program will put your case back on the court’s trial docket.

Some examples of typical requirements under OWI diversion programs include:

  • Attending alcohol counseling
  • Attending substance abuse classes
  • Performing community service
  • Submitting to mandatory blood alcohol concentration (BAC) testing
  • Paying fines and restitution
  • Abstaining from illegal drug use and excessive alcohol consumption
  • Avoiding criminal activity (including OWI)

Again, these are just examples. If you are considering diversion to resolve your Wisconsin OWI case, you will want to make sure you understand the specific requirements that apply in your jurisdiction. If you are not confident that you can meet these requirements, seeking diversion might not be your best option.

Should You Seek Diversion in Your Wisconsin OWI Case?

With this in mind, should you seek diversion in your Wisconsin OWI case? The answer to this question depends on your specific circumstances, and you will want to consult with an experienced Madison OWI lawyer to ensure that you are making an informed decision. Here are some of the critical factors your lawyer will help you consider:

1. Are You Eligible to Enroll in an OWI Diversion Program?

First, you must determine whether you can enroll in an OWI diversion program. If you aren’t eligible, there is no point in going any further—instead, you should focus on building your defense or seeking a plea bargain. While many first-time offenders are eligible, there are exceptions, and you do not want to spend time, money, and effort seeking diversion when you should instead be focused on pursuing another route to minimize the consequences of your OWI arrest.

2. Are You Confident in Your Ability to Meet the Program’s Requirements?

Second, you must be confident in meeting the program’s requirements if you are eligible. As mentioned above, if you do not complete your OWI diversion program successfully, your case will be returned to court. If there is a good chance that you will end up fighting your OWI charge anyway, then enrolling in a diversion program might not be worth it.

3. Do You Have Strong Defenses to Your OWI?

Finally, while entering into a diversion program is one way to get your OWI charge dismissed (if you are eligible), this is not the only option for seeking dismissal. If you have strong defenses to your OWI charge, you may be able to avoid a conviction without going through a diversion program. Working with an experienced Madison OWI lawyer who can help you make informed decisions is also critical.

How Do You Enroll in an OWI Diversion Program in Wisconsin?

The steps for enrolling in an OWI diversion program vary between jurisdictions. When you hire a Madison OWI lawyer to represent you, your lawyer will guide you through seeking enrollment. Your lawyer will also help ensure you understand all the requirements you need to meet, and your lawyer will be there if you have questions or concerns while participating in the program.

While diversion can be a good option for resolving your OWI case, once again, you should not assume this is the best approach. To ensure that you are making informed decisions with your long-term best interests in mind and that you do not run out of time to protect yourself, you should speak with a lawyer as soon as possible.

Contact Us for a Free Consultation with a Madison OWI Lawyer

Do you have questions about seeking diversion in your Wisconsin OWI case? If so, we encourage you to contact us promptly for a free consultation. To discuss your case with an experienced Madison OWI lawyer in confidence, call 608-305-4518 or tell us how we can reach you online now.

CALL NOW