To Blow or Not to Blow: Should You Refuse a Chemical Test in Wisconsin?
The number one question asked of our attorneys in social settings is “Should I blow or not blow if stopped by the police?” The cheap and easy response is blow if you know you will pass. However, it’s more complicated than that in understanding your rights and the risks.
When pulled over under suspicion of operating while intoxicated (OWI) in Wisconsin, you might be faced with a crucial decision: whether or not to submit to an evidentiary chemical test of your blood, breath or urine. This decision can significantly impact your legal situation, and understanding both the legal and practical implications is essential.
Understanding the Legal Context
Wisconsin, like all states, has an Implied Consent Law. This means that by driving on public roads, you have implicitly consented to chemical testing (breath, blood, or urine) if an officer has probable cause to believe you are under the influence of alcohol, drugs or a combination thereof. Refusing to take an Implied Consent test has both immediate and long-term consequences.
Immediate Consequences of Refusing
- Automatic License Revocation: In Wisconsin, refusing to take an Implied Consent test results in the issuance of a Notice of Intent to Revoke Operating Privilege form which law enforcement will file with the applicable court. If you fail to request a hearing to contest the refusal allegation within 10 business days, adverse judgment will be entered against you and your license will be revoked commencing 30 days from the date of notice. For a first offense, the revocation period is one year with a 30-day wait period before you would be eligible for even an occupational license. For a second offense, the revocation period is two years with a 90-day wait period before you would be eligible for an occupational license. For a third offense or greater, the revocation period is three years with a 120-day wait period before you would be eligible for an occupational license. In all cases the court will order that any vehicle owned or operated by you be equipped with an Ignition Interlock Device (IID). The court will additionally order that you complete an Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse (AODA) assessment and complete any recommended education or counselling. Failure to do so will result in a separate non-compliance revocation and render you ineligible for an occupational license. This revocation is separate from any criminal charges or penalties that may arise from the underlying OWI arrest itself.
- Potential for a Search Warrant: If you refuse any Implied Consent test, the arresting officer may, and in most cases will, obtain a search warrant to compel a blood test. This can lead to further complications and delays, and a blood test may be more incriminating if it shows a higher blood alcohol concentration (BAC) than what might have been indicated by a breath or urine test, in the event that one of those methods was what was originally requested. More importantly, if a compelled blood draw is performed, you will potentially have incurred the penalties for refusing in vain.
- Evidentiary Concerns and Potentially Increased Penalties: Even if a compelled blood draw is not performed, the refusal itself can be used as evidence of guilt in court. Prosecutors may argue that your refusal indicates a consciousness of guilt. In other words, a judge or jury may presume that the reason you refused an implied consent test is that you knew that it would likely be incriminating. Recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings have held that an individual has a protected constitutional right to refuse a blood draw and cannot be criminally punished for exercising such a protected right. That said, the reality is that a sentencing judge will be aware of your lack of cooperation and while no express punishment is permissible, it is likely to influence his or her sentencing decision. And there is no such prohibition on increased penalties if a breath or urine test is originally requested.
- Long-Term Considerations
- Impact on Legal Strategy: If you refuse an Implied Consent test, your defense attorney may have fewer options to challenge the evidence against you. For example, the burden of proof in a refusal hearing is significantly lower than the burden of proof in the underlying OWI. This is particularly problematic in a first offense OWI, where the penalties for the refusal are more onerous than those of the underlying OWI. In other words, even if you have a winning strategy for a defense to the OWI, you may end up in a worse position if you are convicted of the refusal but avoid the OWI. On the other hand, if you agree to the test and your BAC is above the legal limit, the evidence against you is straightforward, but there might still be avenues to contest the legality of the stop, arrest or the administration of the test.
- Insurance and Driving Record: An OWI conviction, combined with a license revocation, can impact your driving record and insurance rates for years to come. A refusal can exacerbate these issues, leading to increased insurance premiums and potential difficulties in getting coverage.
When Might Refusal be Considered?
Refusing an Implied Consent test might be considered if you believe the test could lead to an inaccurate result, particularly if you have concerns about the test’s reliability or the potential for a false positive. Additionally, if you are aware that your BAC is significantly over the legal limit, some might argue that refusing the test could be a strategic move to avoid more compelling evidence of intoxication. However, as stated above, law enforcement will almost certainly obtain a search warrant for a compelled blood draw rendering the refusal futile. The reality is that refusing an Implied Consent test is a mistake in nearly every situation.
Consulting a Legal Professional
Given the complexities of OWI cases, consulting a DUI lawyer who specializes in Wisconsin law is crucial if you’ve been charged with a refusal and underlying OWI. Here at Mays Law Office, LLC, our experienced drunk driving attorneys can provide personalized advice based on your case specifics, help you understand the potential outcomes, guide you through the legal process, and develop and execute winning defense strategies.
Recent Comments