Sometimes clients can be their own worst enemies. And when acts of self-sabotage occur, that is when patience, compassion and persistence are at a tremendous premium. In a recent post, Attorney John Orth reported the following:
“While on probation for 10 counts of theft and robbery, R.A. was arrested for 14 additional counts of criminal charges, primarily theft and drug possession. She was confined to jail on a probation hold and proceedings to revoke her probation were initiated. Both episodes were clearly motivated by R.A.’s addiction. Despite the severity of both the original and new charges, Attorney Orth was able to persuade both her probation agent and the prosecuting attorney that the inadequacy of her previous treatment plan was the root cause of reoffending. After helping her to secure placement at a long-term treatment facility, Attorney Orth was able to avoid the revocation of her probation and secure a disposition on the new charges that avoided any further reincarceration.”
Sounds like a happy ending? Not so fast. Between the writing of the above narrative and the next court date at which this superlative disposition was to be formalized, R.A. absconded from her treatment facility after less than two weeks and resumed intensive drug use. Upon learning this, Attorney Orth immediately contacted R. A. and recommended that she turn herself in prior to the next court date as the best first step to repaving the way to reviving the settlement that he had previously secured. R. A. did not follow Attorney Orth’s recommendation and instead committed seven more felony retail thefts.
As is inevitably the case, R.A. was eventually picked up and placed on a probation hold and revocation proceedings were initiated once again. Attorney Orth was able to again secure an alternative to probation revocation in the form of supervised drug abuse treatment. However, this outcome would be contingent on the prosecuting attorney’s agreement to not pursue imprisonment on any of the pending charges. Given the circumstances and chronic nature of R.A.’s criminal history, this seemed unlikely. Yet that is exactly what happened. While the prosecution had initially revoked its previous agreement upon learning of R.A.’s latest crime spree, Attorney Orth was able to work with the Department of Corrections and the District Attorney’s Office to craft a solution that adequately satisfied both the concern for public welfare and R.A.’s treatment needs. R.A. is presently participating in an intensive treatment program. Upon successful completion of this program all pending charges will be resolved with a non-prison disposition. Although, as we know from experience, things don’t always go as planned.
Now, let’s consider the results achieved for client E.R. Following a highly contentious separation from his wife, E.R. was arrested and charged with felony first degree reckless endangering safety from an incident in which he was alleged to have deliberately cut the gas line at his ex-wife’s home in what the prosecution viewed as an attempt to end the lives of his ex-wife and children. The crime of first degree reckless endangering safety is defined by Wisconsin law as follows:
1. The defendant endangered the safety of another human being.
2. The defendant endangered the safety of another by criminally reckless conduct.
“Criminally reckless conduct” means the conduct created a risk of death or great bodily harm to another person; and the risk of death or great bodily harm was unreasonable and substantial; and the defendant was aware that his or her conduct created the unreasonable and substantial risk of death or great bodily harm.
“Great bodily harm” means injury which creates a substantial risk of death, or which causes serious permanent disfigurement, or which causes a permanent or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ, or other serious bodily injury.
3. The circumstances of the defendant’s conduct showed utter disregard for human life. In determining whether the circumstances of the conduct showed utter disregard for human life, consider these factors: what the defendant was doing; why the defendant was engaged in that conduct; how dangerous the conduct was; how obvious the danger was; whether the conduct showed any regard for life; and all other facts and circumstances relating to the conduct.
E.R. acknowledged tripping over a gas line while visiting the property but fastidiously denied that he caused any damage intentionally. Certainly a simple accident could not constitute “criminally reckless conduct” as described above. Knowing that an accidental tear could be distinguished from and intentional cutting, Attorney Orth enlisted the assistance of an expert from the National Association of Firearm and Tool Mark Examiners and was ultimately able to convince the prosecuting attorney that no crime at all had been committed resulting in the dismissal of the first degree reckless endangering safety charge.
And then there is client G.T., a U.W. Madison student. G.T. had a not-so-great evening recently. Following a bit more imbibement than good judgment would recommend, G.T. woke up to find that he had been issued a criminal charge of disorderly conduct. It turns out that passing out in a stranger’s front lawn can be viewed as criminally disturbing behavior. Given G.T.’s relative youth and lack of any criminal history, it would seem a shame to have G.T.’s reputation marred by even a criminal charge being filed, much less a conviction being sought. In such situations it is critical to have experienced and aggressive representation that knows when and how to intervene to get the best possible outcome. Where some attorneys might simply wait for the court date assigned to G.T., enter a not guilty plea and then attempt to negotiate a favorable disposition at a later time, Attorney Orth took a more proactive approach. Knowing that police reports and a charging recommendation would be filed with the District Attorney’s Office within the few weeks following the incident, he made contact with the District Attorney’s Office on a daily basis until the case was under review for a charging decision. When that occurred Attorney Orth was able to arrange a meeting with the Assistant District Attorney who was reviewing the case. Following that meeting charges were declined altogether and G.T. was spared with unpleasantness and public humiliation that comes with defending against criminal charges.
The post The Year 2024 Started Off With A Bang Due To Incredible Advocating By Attorney John Orth appeared first on Mays Law Office.
]]>When facing a DUI charge in Wisconsin, it is critical to ensure that you are making informed decisions. There is a lot you need to know; and, if you make uninformed decisions, you could find yourself facing unnecessary consequences.
Making informed decisions starts with understanding the questions you need to ask. With this in mind, here are 10 key DUI questions to ask (and answer) when facing a DUI charge in Wisconsin:
There are two types of drunk driving charges in Wisconsin. If you took the breathalyzer during your DUI stop and blew above the legal limit, you are most likely being charged with prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC). If you refused the breathalyzer, couldn’t generate a reading, or blew under the legal limit, you are most likely being charged with operating while intoxicated (OWI).
While PAC and OWI charges are similar in some respects, there are also several key differences. As a result, determining whether you are facing a PAC charge or an OWI charge is one of the first steps toward determining what defenses you have available.
Along with determining whether you are facing a PAC charge or an OWI charge, you also need to determine whether you are facing any other charges as a result of your drunk driving arrest. There are several possibilities, including (but not limited to):
Each of these charges carries different penalties, and some of these charges are far more serious than others. But, you need to take all of the charges against you seriously, as any type of conviction can lead to financial costs and other consequences.
Another key piece of information you need after a DUI arrest is your first court date. You need to make plans to be there on time, as failing to do so can have consequences regardless of whether you were driving under the influence. If you don’t show up, you can be charged with failure to appear, and this can result in a bench warrant being issued for your arrest.
Understanding the penalties you are facing will also help you make informed decisions about your defense. At a minimum, you are facing several hundred dollars in fines and surcharges plus a six to nine-month driver’s license suspension. But, if you are a repeat offender, or if you are being charged with causing a serious accident while driving under the influence, the penalties you are facing could be far greater.
Along with court-imposed penalties, a PAC or OWI conviction can lead to various other consequences as well. These include everything from increased auto insurance premiums to disciplinary action if you are a licensed professional. Between increased insurance premiums, consequences for your career, and other financial costs, the collateral consequences of a drunk driving conviction can far exceed the costs you face in court.
Given all that you have at stake, you must fight your PAC or OWI charge by all means available. Once you know what charge (or charges) you are facing, then you can determine which defenses you can use to protect yourself. Here, too, there are lots of possibilities—and the key is to ensure that you put together the strongest defense strategy possible in light of all relevant facts and circumstances.
Let’s say you were driving under the influence and prosecutors have the evidence they need to prove it. In this scenario, fighting your PAC or OWI charge in court might not be your best option. Instead, it might be best to consider another option—such as negotiating a plea bargain or entering into one of Wisconsin’s pre-trial diversion programs. Negotiating a plea bargain typically means facing the reduced consequences of a “wet reckless,” while entering into a pre-trial diversion program allows eligible defendants to avoid a conviction entirely.
Examining all of the available evidence will allow you to make an informed decision about how best to approach your case. This is a critical decision that could impact your life for years to come, so you need to ensure that you make it wisely.
When you are facing a DUI charge in Wisconsin, hiring an experienced defense lawyer is the best way to ensure that you are making informed decisions about your case. There are lots of ways an experienced defense lawyer will be able to help you, and you should schedule a free consultation to learn more as soon as possible.
When you schedule a free consultation with a DUI defense lawyer, you should be able to find out exactly how much your legal representation is going to cost you. There should be no hidden costs or fees, and you should be able to weigh the costs of your legal representation against the potential costs of trying to handle your Wisconsin drunk driving case on your own.
If you are facing a drunk driving (PAC or OWI) charge in Wisconsin and would like to know more about your case, we encourage you to get in touch. To schedule a free and confidential consultation with a Madison DUI lawyer at Mays Law Office, please call 608-257-0440 or request an appointment online today.
The post 10 Key DUI Questions to Ask (and Answer) When Facing a DUI in Wisconsin appeared first on Mays Law Office.
]]>The post Facing a DUI as a Licensed Professional in Wisconsin appeared first on Mays Law Office.
]]>
While DUI charges carry steep penalties in Wisconsin, these aren’t the only potential consequences of a drunk driving arrest. Getting arrested for DUI can impact your life in a variety of other ways as well—especially if you are a licensed professional.
For physicians, pharmacists, registered nurses, attorneys, accountants, and other licensed professionals, DUI arrests can have serious implications for their careers. These arrests (like others) can trigger professional disciplinary action with potential outcomes ranging from reprimands to license revocation. As a result, a comprehensive and informed defense strategy is key, and licensed professionals must ensure that the decisions they make in their DUI cases do not put their licenses in jeopardy.
Here are five important considerations for licensed professionals facing DUI charges in Wisconsin:
Most professional licensing boards require that their members report DUIs promptly. Typically, this means separately reporting both your arrest and your conviction (if you accept a plea bargain or get convicted in court). If you enter into Wisconsin’s Pre-Charge Diversion Program, you may have an obligation to report this to your professional licensing board as well.
Along with understanding that you may need to report your DUI, one of the other most important things to understand about your situation is that a DUI arrest can lead to professional discipline even if it doesn’t result in a conviction. Why? Because professional licensing boards apply different standards than Wisconsin’s county courts. In court, prosecutors must prove your guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.” This means that there must be no question that you are guilty of driving under the influence.
But, professional licensing boards typically use the “preponderance of the evidence” standard. This means the evidence only needs to suggest that it is more likely than not that you violated the governing rules of professional conduct. The rules governing your profession may also impose discipline for conduct short of driving under the influence such as drinking to excess, drinking in public, or using illegal drugs. As a result, any defenses you can assert in your DUI case won’t necessarily protect you in your professional disciplinary proceeding. Protecting your professional license may require a very different approach, and it will be critical to have a clear understanding of what exactly you need to defend against in both proceedings.
If you don’t report your DUI to your professional licensing board, this could have licensing consequences of its own. Failing to make a required disclosure can be considered a lack of candor under most professional licensing rules, and this itself can be grounds for professional discipline. This is true whether or not you eventually get convicted of driving under the influence. As a result, it is important to satisfy your reporting obligations—and to focus on preparing a sound defense instead of hoping to sidestep disciplinary action.
Due to the significant differences between DUI cases and professional disciplinary proceedings, you must be very careful about how you approach your DUI case. While certain statements and actions might be beneficial in your DUI case, these same statements and actions could potentially increase your exposure to professional discipline.
The reverse is also true. If you admit to driving under the influence during your professional disciplinary case, prosecutors may be able to use your admission against you in court. Again, an informed approach is critical, and you will need to work closely with your defense attorney to ensure that you do not say or do anything that could increase your risk of facing criminal penalties or losing your professional license.
Getting arrested for DUI (and even getting convicted of DUI) doesn’t necessarily mean that you will lose your professional license—though this may be a very real possibility. But, even if you don’t lose your license, a DUI conviction could still have significant and long-term negative consequences for your career.
A DUI conviction will go on your permanent record—and it will stay there. In Wisconsin, DUI convictions are not eligible for expungement. As a result, if you get convicted, your conviction will stay with you for the rest of your life. It will show up on background checks when you apply for new positions or seek funding to start your practice; and, as a result, you may lose access to certain opportunities. If your current employer decides that your DUI reflects negatively on your abilities or the organization’s reputation, you could lose your current job as well.
With all of this in mind, how should you approach your DUI? To ensure that you are doing everything you can to protect yourself, you should discuss your situation with an experienced defense attorney as soon as possible. An experienced defense attorney will be able to explain the criminal and professional licensing implications of your arrest and will be able to help you make informed decisions while building your defense strategy.
When facing a DUI as a licensed professional, time is of the essence. Unnecessary delays (and other mistakes) can lead to unnecessary consequences. To discuss your situation with an experienced defense attorney in confidence, contact us today.
If you are a licensed professional in Wisconsin and are currently facing a DUI charge, we encourage you to contact us promptly for more information. To schedule a free DUI defense consultation at Mays Law Office, please call 608-257-0440 or request an appointment online today.
The post Facing a DUI as a Licensed Professional in Wisconsin appeared first on Mays Law Office.
]]>The workers compensation insurance adjuster is not being reasonable and now I need to go to a Hearing to have a judge decide my benefits? What should I expect?
Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays represents only Wisconsin injured workers. Every client scheduled to go to Hearing is litigated by Atty. Pierobon Mays. Prior to the hearing, Lisa will thoroughly prepare her client for the Hearing. She meets with them a few days prior to the hearing and works with them over several hours to get them prepared and ready to give testimony – basically telling the Administrative Law Judge with the Office of Workers Compensation Hearings the details of the injury and how it has impacted the injured worker. Attorney Pierobon Mays’ clients always feel well-prepared for a Hearing. Lisa believes the more prepared her clients are to give testimony, the more confident they will feel at the Hearing. Another way she prepares her client is to take the mystery out of it, here is what occurs at a Hearing.
Hearings are scheduled at various locations throughout the state of Wisconsin. In general, the geographical location for the Hearing is determined by the location of the employee’s residence, or where the injury occurred. The greatest travel convenience for the injured worker (also called the Applicant) is the priority city for the scheduling of a Hearing. The biggest city closest to such will be selected. So, for example. an Applicant who resides in Baraboo will have their Hearing scheduled in Madison.
After a Hearing date is set, all parties are notified by a written, blue-colored notice. The Notice of Hearing is usually mailed to the parties eight to ten weeks in advance, but hearings can be scheduled with as little as ten days’ notice in emergency cases.
The parties required to attend the Hearing is the Applicant (injured workers), her Attorney, the Attorney (called Opposing Counsel) for the workers compensation insurance company, a representative for the insurance company or employer, if desired by them. Also, all relevant witnesses, the Judge, and the Court Reporter.
The Office of Worker’s Compensation Hearings schedules Hearings in 4-hour time slots, starting at 8am and finishing at Noon. Or, starting at 1pm and finishing at 4pm. If the parties run out of time, then a continued hearing will be scheduled, usually within a few months, as the Scheduler needs to coordinate to ensure that all parties, including the judge, are available.
At Hearing, the Administrative Law Judge is actively involved and in charge of handling all the preliminaries. The Judge is responsible for making sure that all the necessary parties are present, that the issues of the claim are mutually understood. The Judge is responsible for protecting the record of the claim by allowing testimony and evidence to be pursued by all the parties. Any objections to such are resolved by the Judge with a ruling on the record. The Judge swears in all witnesses who promise to give truthful testimony. The Judge is also protective of the Court Reporter, who transcribes/stenographs testimony and marks exhibits, by making sure that she can properly hear and see the live testimony.
Hearings are intended to be somewhat informal, and the Judge will often interrupt when the injured worker (Applicant) is giving testimony for clarification or to ask her own questions of the Applicant. Keep in mind, the Judge wants to make a well-informed and thorough decision so anything that the Judge feels is confusing or not explored, then she will follow-up on.
At Hearing, the injured worker (Applicant) has the burden to prove that he is entitled to monetary benefits because a work injury caused lost time/wages, medical expense, and permanent disability. Such issues are proven by the Applicant testifying as to the details of the injury such as who, what, where, when, and why details of their injury. As to the medical questions, a physician generally does not come to the hearing to testify but instead answers a series of questions on a 2-page form approved by the State of Wisconsin Division of Hearings and Appeals.
Applicants should be prepared to testify and know what questions are going to be asked of them on direction examination. Simple rules should be followed by the Applicant such as always speak with audible words. Nodding or shaking of the head to respond Yes or No is not allowed because the Court Reporter only transcribes verbal words. Also, “Uh uh” or “Uh huh” means nothing to the Court Reporter and should never be uttered by any witness when testifying. Other Do’s and Don’ts when testifying, tantamount to winning and losing at Hearing, are taught at Mays Law Office. Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays always prepares her client’s a few days before the Hearing so that they are ready and confident to give testimony at the Hearing.
Workers’ Compensation Hearings are generally amicable. Contentious behavior at a Hearing is deemed unproductive and Judges will be protective of a witness being treated with disrespect. However, Cross-Examination questions feel different than those on direct. For instance, a witness who is asked, “What is the weather like outside today?” is given broad freedom to answer the question. On Cross-Examination, the questions will not be so open-ended, instead the same question will be asked “Isn’t is true that the weather is cloudy and cold today?” A simple is suggested in the question, that answer being a “Yes” or “No”. Applicants often feel cornered by questions on Cross-Examination because they are unable to break free and speak their own words. Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays always prepares her clients for this type of questioning. She reminds them that she always gets the last word with her client on Redirect Examination where she can circle back to any questions asked on Cross-Examination that need further detail or explanation.
Absolutely Yes you can bring someone to support you at the Hearing. Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays encourages a supporting person come to the Hearing. A Workers Compensation Hearing can be intimidating with the presence of a Judge, Court Reporter and Opposing Counsel. Nervous feelings are expected so Lisa tells her clients that if they are feeling nervous when giving testimony then their support person will be seated in a visible spot where they can see a friendly face supporting them.
If your support person is also going to be a witness, then the Opposing Counsel will likely make a Motion to Sequester your witness which means that the witness needs to remain out of the Hearing room until it is time for him to give testimony. Once the testimony is done then they can stay and watch the rest of the Hearing.
No, the Administrative Law Judge has a lot to consider after the Hearing. They like to thoroughly review all the Exhibits, read portions of the testimony transcript, and allow the parties a few weeks to follow-up on anything that was discussed but not resolved at the hearing, such as updated medical records or billing itemizations. Once the record is closed then the Judge should have a written decision in 90 days, however this is not mandatory, just suggested.
Workers Compensation claims often do settle after the Hearing. A Hearing gives both sides the opportunity to see the strengths and weaknesses of their case. An Applicant who testifies well at Hearing and if very little damaging evidence is presented by Opposing Counsel, then it is a good sign that the claim will likely go in favor of the Applicant. In those cases, Opposing Counsel will go back to their client, the Worker Compensation Insurance Carrier, to update and advise them of such and encourage them to reinitiate settlement discussions. Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays always keeps her clients updated on all settlement discussions, patiently answering all questions, and addressing all concerns that her client’s may have.
A Wisconsin injured worker should never feel forced to settle their workers compensation claim. It is their right to have a Hearing decided by an Administrative Law Judge. When hiring a Wisconsin workers compensation attorney, the injured worker needs to choose carefully who they want as their advocate. Too many attorneys want to just settle claims and move on to the next client. Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays never stops advocating for her client. She always keeps the client’s best interest as a priority.
Check out what our clients have said about our representation on Google and see our perfect 5 Star Google Rating.
The post GOING TO A WORKER’S COMPENSATION HEARING? HERE’S WHAT TO EXPECT. appeared first on Mays Law Office.
]]>The general public does not view recreational vehicles (snowmobiles, ATV’s and UTV’s, etc) as they would a regular car or automobile. And in turn, the general public doesn’t consider the consequences for recreational vehicle drunk driving offenses. However, under Wisconsin law, a snowmobile meets the definition of a “motor vehicle” (i..e., engine-driven vehicle) and thus the question of whether one can be cited for a drunk driving offense (i.e., OWI or DUI) when operating a snowmobile in Wisconsin – is answered “Yes.”
Wisconsin law treats driving or operating a snowmobile while under the influence of alcohol or drugs very similar to driving or operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. The legal – or illegal – blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit for operating a snowmobile in Wisconsin is typically the same as for driving a car, which is 0.08%.
A driver’s license is not required to operate a snowmobile. However, there are restrictions based on age and birth year. No person under 12 may use a snowmobile unless accompanied by a parent or guardian or someone over 18. The statute defines “accompany” as being on the same snowmobile as the operator.
In addition, any snowmobile driver who is at least 12 years of age and born on or after January 1, 1985, may only operate a snowmobile if they hold a valid snowmobile safety certificate. If a snowmobile driver is required to have a safety certificate, they must carry proof of the certificate and display it upon request from law enforcement.
Much like operating motor vehicles, it is illegal to:
Wisconsin state law requires a person to provide a sample of their breath for a preliminary breath screening test if the officer has “probable cause to believe” the person is operating while intoxicated. The PBT is only for the purpose of confirming that the officer had probable cause to arrest. There is no penalty for refusing the preliminary breath test.
Snowmobile operators can be arrested for drunk driving on publicly or privately owned land regardless of whether a fee is charged for using that property.
On private land not designated as a snowmobile trail, it does not apply unless an accident involving injury occurs and the snowmobile was operated on the private land without the consent of the land owner.
According to Wis. Stat. §350.103, any person who operates a snowmobile on the public land highways of Wisconsin has already given (implied) consent to provide a sample of their breath, blood or urine.
Before requesting the sample, law enforcement must inform the person that:
What about an unconscious person who is incapable of withdrawing consent for a chemical test. In such a situation, Wisconsin law presumes that the person did not withdraw consent (but only if law enforcement has probable cause to believe the person was operating while intoxicated.)
The refusal to provide a sample is subject to the same penalties and procedures as a violation of operating under the influence while snowmobiling.
A first-time offender will be fined not less than $400 nor more than $550.
A second offense with a prior snowmobile OWI (or refusal conviction) within five years of the current offense will be fined no less than $300 or more than $1,000 and imprisoned for less than five days or more than six months.
A person who, within five years before their arrest for the current violation, was convicted two or more times of a snowmobile OWI or refusal violation will be fined not less than $600 nor more than $2,000 and shall be imprisoned not less than 30 days nor more than one year in the county jail.
Any person who fails to stop at the request of law enforcement or causes injury to another while operating a snowmobile while intoxicated will be fined not less than $300 nor more than $2,000 and may be imprisoned for not less than 30 days nor more than one year in the county jail.
In addition to the penalties listed above, a conviction will result in an order by the court to submit to, and comply with, an assessment of the person’s use of alcohol or controlled substances.
Consult With Counsel
If you’ve been arrested for drunk driving on a snowmobile in Wisconsin, don’t wait to contact a competent legal defense. The experienced drunk driving defense attorneys at Mays Law Office, LLC will fight for you and help you through the legal process.
Our firm has nearly 80 years and a proven track record of success in representing our clients in all sorts of drunk driving and other criminal and workers compensation cases. Contact us today to schedule a consultation.
The post Can You Get a DUI on a Snowmobile in Wisconsin? appeared first on Mays Law Office.
]]>If you are facing a DUI charge in Wisconsin, you do not want to try to handle your case on your own. While this might seem like the best (or cheapest) option, trying to handle your case without a lawyer can end up being extremely costly. Successfully defending against a DUI charge is not easy, and getting convicted can have serious consequences. As a result, it is strongly in your best interests to seek experienced legal representation as soon as possible.
Were you arrested for driving under the influence in Wisconsin? If so, here are 10 reasons why you should hire a lawyer to handle your DUI case:
Regardless of whether this is your first offense or you are a repeat offender, a DUI conviction can lead to substantial penalties. For first-time offenders, potential penalties include up to a nine-month driver’s license suspension, hundreds of dollars in fines and surcharges, and mandatory installation of an ignition interlock device on your vehicle (if your BAC was 0.15% or above). If you have a prior DUI within the past 10 years, you are facing even greater penalties—including jail time.
Along with these penalties, a DUI conviction can have several other serious consequences. For one thing, your auto insurance rates will skyrocket for the next several years. Having a DUI conviction on your record can also make it hard to land a job; and, if you have a professional license, are a member of the military, or are a foreign citizen, you could face consequences in these areas as well.
To successfully fight your DUI charge, you may need to assert multiple defenses in court. Prosecutors may have several forms of evidence against you, and they will be able to secure a conviction by proving that either: (i) your BAC was over the legal limit, or (ii) your driving abilities were impaired. They do not need to prove both. As a result, if you challenge the prosecution’s evidence of impairment but not your BAC (or vice versa), you will still be at risk for a conviction.
In some cases, negotiating a plea bargain will be your best option. However, you should not pursue a plea bargain unless you are certain that there are not better options available. While a “wet reckless” carries substantially fewer consequences than a DUI, you should not subject yourself to any consequences unnecessarily.
One way that you may be able to avoid consequences entirely is by entering into a diversion program. These programs “divert” your case from trial; and, if you complete all of the program’s requirements, your DUI case will be dismissed. An experienced DUI lawyer will be able to determine if your case qualifies for diversion; and, if so, your lawyer will be able to help you decide if entering into a diversion program is your best option.
There are several ways to fight a DUI charge in Wisconsin. If you have grounds to fight your charge, you should not accept a plea or subject yourself to the requirements of a diversion program. Your lawyer will be able to evaluate your case and determine which defenses he or she can assert on your behalf. Based on this evaluation, you can then make an informed decision about how best to handle your case.
Despite the fact that there are several defenses to DUI charges in Wisconsin, prosecutors win DUI convictions all the time. Many prosecutors are extremely good at what they do; and, in many respects, the legal system is built in their favor. As a result, avoiding a conviction requires a knowledgeable and strategic approach—and this requires experienced legal representation.
Even if prosecutors have enough evidence to secure a conviction (as is often the case), they may not be able to use their evidence against you. For example, if the police stopped you without reasonable suspicion or arrested you without probable cause, this may render the prosecution’s evidence inadmissible. However, to keep the prosecution’s evidence out of court, you must be able to prove that the police violated your constitutional rights. Prosecutors aren’t going to withhold their evidence voluntarily, and it isn’t the judge’s responsibility to protect you.
Given these considerations, a wrongful conviction is a very real possibility. Additionally, even if a conviction is warranted, you could face a far greater sentence than necessary if you try to handle your case on your own. Simply put, hiring an experienced DUI lawyer is the best way to minimize the risks you are facing.
While you will need to pay for your lawyer’s services, hiring a lawyer is ultimately likely to be your least costly option. If your lawyer helps you avoid fines, surcharges, or increased insurance premiums—and if your lawyer protects your driver’s license or keeps you out of jail—your legal representation will more than pay for itself.
If you are facing a DUI charge in Wisconsin, we strongly encourage you to contact us for more information. We provide free initial consultations, and we can help you make smart decisions about your next steps. To discuss your case with an experienced WI DUI lawyer in confidence, please call 608-257-0440 or send us a message online today.
The post 10 Reasons to Hire a Lawyer for Your Wisconsin DUI Case appeared first on Mays Law Office.
]]>Drunk driving charges come with serious risks in Wisconsin. If you get convicted, you will be at risk for substantial penalties, and your conviction could negatively impact your life in a variety of other ways.
To protect yourself, you need to make sure you are making smart decisions. There is a lot you need to know, and there are a lot of myths, misconceptions, and mistakes you need to avoid. We published several articles on fighting DUI charges in Wisconsin throughout 2023. Here are some of the key takeaways if you find yourself awaiting trial on a DUI charge in the New Year:
The first thing to know is that there are two different types of DUI charges under Wisconsin law. You can be charged with either: (i) operating while intoxicated (OWI); or, (ii) operating with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC).
When you are facing an OWI charge, prosecutors must prove that your ability to drive was impaired—and they can do so without your blood alcohol concentration (BAC). Conversely, in a PAC case, the only question is whether your BAC was over the legal limit. Learn more: OWI vs. PAC: What’s the Difference in Wisconsin.
Along with Wisconsin’s OWI and PAC laws, it is also important for you to know about the state’s implied consent law. This law requires you to take the breathalyzer during your traffic stop if your arresting officer asks you to do so (though some exceptions apply).
Violating Wisconsin’s implied consent law can lead to an additional charge—and you can be penalized for an implied consent violation regardless of whether you were driving under the influence. But, there are defenses available, and your defense lawyer will be able to help you fight your “DUI refusal” charge if necessary. Learn more: What is Wisconsin’s Implied Consent Law.
It might be tempting to ignore your DUI, especially during the holiday season. But, this is a mistake that you cannot afford to make. Prosecutors will not ignore your case; and, if you don’t show up in court, they will seek (and almost certainly win) a conviction in your absence.
In fact, rather than ignoring your DUI, you should make defending against it your top priority. While this might not be fun, it is important—and you will thank yourself later. To learn more about the importance of prioritizing your DUI defense, you can read: What Happens if You Ignore Your OWI or PAC in Wisconsin?
When you have an OWI or PAC charge pending, knowing that to do and knowing what not to do are equally important. To ensure that you are making smart decisions with your future in mind, you can read: “Dos” and “Don’ts” to Protect Yourself After a Drunk Driving Arrest in Wisconsin.
While our “’Dos’ and ‘Don’ts’” article covers some of the mistakes you need to avoid when facing a DUI charge in Wisconsin, there are many more mistakes that can leave you facing unnecessary consequences. To learn more about what not to do while your DUI case is pending, you can read: 10 Mistakes to Avoid After a DUI Arrest in Wisconsin.
You have clear legal rights as a defendant in Wisconsin’s criminal justice system. You also had clear legal rights during your traffic stop and arrest. If the police violated your rights, or if prosecutors violate your rights during your DUI case, this may provide you with a defense regardless of whether you were driving under the influence. Learn more: Asserting Your Constitutional Rights in a Wisconsin OWI/PAC Case.
But, what if you admitted to driving drunk on the side of the road? Even in this scenario, you could still have defenses available. This includes (but is not limited to) defenses based on violations of your legal rights. To learn why you should always fight your DUI charge, you can read: Why You Shouldn’t Plead Guilty Even If You Admitted to Driving Drunk in Wisconsin.
While you have clear legal rights, and while there are many potential defenses to OWI and PAC charges, there are also “defenses” that don’t work. If you were to try to assert one of these “defenses” in court, you would very likely find yourself facing a conviction. Learn more: 10 “Defenses” that Won’t Protect You Against a DUI Conviction in Wisconsin.
DUI charges are always serious. But, they can be even more serious if you are charged with causing an accident while driving under the influence. In this scenario, you can face enhanced penalties—and you can even be charged with a felony in some cases. To find out what you need to know about facing a DUI charge after an accident, you can read: What Happens if You Get in an Accident While Driving Drunk in Wisconsin?
Finally, if you weren’t aware of Wisconsin’s implied consent law when you got pulled over, you may have refused the breathalyzer. As we mentioned above, this could mean that you are facing an additional charge for a “DUI refusal.” But, how will your refusal impact your DUI case?
As we also mentioned above, prosecutors can secure an OWI conviction without your BAC. So, even if you refused the breathalyzer, you still need to be prepared to fight your drunk driving charge. To learn more about how your refusal will impact your DUI case, you can read: Can You Be Convicted of DUI in Wisconsin if You Refused the Breathalyzer?
Are you facing a DUI charge in Wisconsin? If so, we can help. To speak with an experienced defense lawyer at Mays Law Office in confidence, call 608-257-0440 or request a free consultation online today.
The post Fighting a DUI in Wisconsin in 2024: Key Lessons from the Past Year appeared first on Mays Law Office.
]]>The post FAQs About Wisconsin Workers Compensation appeared first on Mays Law Office.
]]>You have been hurt at work, you are scared and do not know what to do or who to listen to. Mays Law Office hears this question every single day. Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays talks to injured workers daily – free of charge. Every story varies but the emotions are always the same – fear, confusion, uncertainty, and even anger. No one wakes up and thinks “Oh Boy, I sure hope I get hurt at work today.” Accidents causing injuries at workplaces happen daily and fault, for the most part with certain legal exceptions, is not a factor in Wisconsin. So, let’s say you slip and fall because a puddle of water was left on the floor, or you are walking too fast and miss a step running up the stairs and you blow out your knee. In those kinds of situations, blame and fault is not a factor to be considered and not a reason to be denied workers compensation benefits.
So, what is the process once a Wisconsin worker injures himself? The first question is whether the injury is serious enough that medical treatment is required? Obviously, any injury involving broken bones, stitches, serious pain, difficulties with mobility should be medically treated immediately. All work injuries should be reported to the employer so that an Incident/Accident Report can be timely completed by you and your supervisor. Work comp claims can and have been denied for failure to report them timely to the employer; by not doing so raises suspicion and puts the injured workers credibility and honesty at risk. With such information, your employer is responsible for notifying their workers compensation insurance carrier so that a claim can be opened, an investigation started, and benefits for lost time and medical treatment paid.
Once a workers compensation claim is filed, everyone has responsibilities. The Employer is responsible to comply with any requests for complete, truthful, and timely information made by the workers compensation carrier. The Workers Compensation Insurance Carrier is responsible to diligently investigate the claim, respond to the employer’s reporting of the claim, talk to witnesses, get a statement from the injured worker as to the details how the work injury occurred. The insurance carrier should also be reviewing medical records and sending out medical authorizations for the injured worker to sign for the review of their relevant medical records. All of this is necessary for the workers compensation carrier to make a timely decision to either accept or deny, in good faith, the workers compensation claim.
The Injured Worker is responsible to give true and accurate statements as to how the injury occurred to their employer, the workers compensation insurance carrier, and their doctors. Every statement of recollection must be consistent as to date, time, details, witnesses, and pain symptoms. Any inconsistency can, and likely will, be used against the injured worker to deny the claim. The injured worker must maintain a good relationship with their medical providers. Meaning, do not miss doctor’s appointments. Do not disregard your doctor’s advice, treatment, and recommendations. Keep in mind that your doctor will not be keen to support your claim if you have been a difficult patient. Doctors like patients that follow their treatment, listen to their recommendations, and appear to want to get better. Maintaining integrity with your doctors is of utmost importance because your comments and behavior is being documented in your medical records with every single communication that you have with them and their medical office staff, meaning their medical assistants, nurses, and even receptionist. Also, the injured worker must keep their employer informed of their physical restrictions and availability to work. Don’t just do this verbally. It should be done by phone, text, email, and in writing so that the employer does not claim that you abandoned your job by failing to communicate after the injury.
Remember, an Injured Worker must never be seen doing anything that would be considered inconsistent with their injury. Stay away from posting on social media as pictures can be damaging and misunderstood. For instance, an injured worker suffering from a sore knee should not be posting pictures with their volleyball club team in a competitive setting. It is only logical to assume that an injured worker with a knee injury would not be able to play volleyball. Likewise, keep in mind that insurance companies hire investigators to conduct surveillance so be watchful as to how you appear to others, in public and even in your own yard, garage, porch, and deck!
If the workers compensation insurance company does not make payment of your benefit within 14 days of receiving notice of the injury, then they must notify you that they are still in the process of investigating your claim. If the insurance company denies your claim, then they must inform you within 7 days of its decision. If these timelines are violated, call Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays for her guidance and potential involvement.
In Wisconsin, employers are not allowed to penalize you for claiming an injury or filing a work injury. Being terminated will not preclude the injured worker from receiving their workers compensation benefits. The employer’s carrier will still be responsible for covering lost time benefits and medical bills. In those situations, Attorney Pierobon Mays will advise you how to discuss the employer’s behavior with the insurance adjuster because employers who behave this badly are likely not being honest with their insurance companies about you and your work injury.
The injured Wisconsin worker has the sole right to choose their own doctor. If you want a second opinion, you must notify the workers compensation carrier of such. In an emergency, the employer may arrange for your treatment until you are able to choose for yourself. Employers and their workers compensation carriers will try to persuade you to see “the company doctor.” Letting the employer dictate who and where you get medical treatment is never going to be in your best interest because the company doctor, employer, and insurance carrier are all sleeping in the same bed and their interests are aligned against yours.
When it comes to medical treatment, the injured worker has the right to every type of treatment which is reasonable and necessary to cure you if it is prescribed by your doctor. This includes clinic visits, tests and imaging, therapy, hospitalizations, and prescriptions. Reimbursement for your travel/mileage to receive such treatment is also paid to you at .51 cents a mile. Keep receipts and provide such to the insurance adjuster assigned to your claim.
Wisconsin workers feel that their privacy is being violated when the workers compensation nurse shows up at her medical appointment and insists on going into the examination room and participates in the medical appointment by asking questions of the doctor. Attorney Pierobon Mays cautions every injured worker to deny such access and forbid this intrusion. All that is required of the injured worker is to sign medical authorizations that allow the nurse case manager access to the medical records and doctor. The nurse can always request to speak to the doctor about the injured worker’s medical care and treatment. Whether the doctor is willing to have such discussions is up to him or her.
While in a healing phase, the Wisconsin worker gets only 2/3 of their average weekly wage up to a determined maximum rate for the year of injury. It is 2/3 because it is tax free. Payment is based on a 6-day work week, regardless of the number of days per week that you worked. So, your daily payment is 1/6 of your weekly payment. The Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development can determine, if in doubt, whether your benefit payment is accurate. Your first lost time disability (referred to as “TTD”) check should be paid to you within 14 days of your last workday due to the injury. You can cash your check without any concern of waiving your legal rights.
The simple answer is Yes but only if the kind of work being offered is truly accommodating within the injured workers doctor mandated physical restrictions. The employer knows that offering an injured employee accommodating work keeps the exposure of lost time benefits low. Moreover, good employees are an asset and every company knows that it is better to work with their employees rather than lose them. Every employee lost is a loss to the business in terms of productiveness, efficiency, skills, profit, and morale.
If the employee refuses truly accommodating work then their lost time benefit, also known as temporary total disability will be waived. Never refuse work. If doubt, call Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays so that she can review the circumstances of your claim to better advice.
Oftentimes, Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays gets calls from an injured worker because they have been instructed that they must go see a workers compensation insurance doctor, termed “Independent Medical Examiner” or an “IME.” Ironically, there is nothing independent about these doctors. These doctors are hired by the workers compensation insurance companies with a bent toward denying benefits. These doctors do not offer medical treatment. They see the injured worker for 15-30 minutes, usually at a rented facility, ask a few questions, all in the hopes that the worker will say or do something inconsistent to give them a bit of information to use against the worker. Like, when one injured worker told the doctor that, before the injury, he enjoyed weightlifting. The alleged Independent Medical Examiner then used this information of weightlifting against the injured worker claiming that the injury was not caused by the lifting of the 100-pound machine which caused the worker to drop to his knees screaming in pain because he herniated a disk in his back.
The quick answer is that the injured workers does have the attend the independent medical examination, but it is essential that they call Attorney Pierobon Mays so that she can prepare you on how to behave, suggest that you take a witness, what to document, and what to say and not say at this appointment. Also, the carrier is required to pre-pay your roundtrip mileage before, not after, the appointment. If not, there are consequences for the insurance carrier. Also, if time is lost from work to attend the appointment, then the carrier needs to reimburse the injured worker accordingly.
If your claim is denied by the workers compensation carrier/handler then you can request a formal hearing with an administrative law judge at the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development. An application for hearing must be completed to get this process started. Also necessary is medical proof in the form of a document called “Practitioner Report of Injury in Lieu of Testimony” which needs to be completed properly by your treating physician, specialist, or surgeon. In this form, your medical provider will describe your diagnosis and prognosis and give an opinion as to whether he/she agrees that such injury is work-related. These forms can be obtained on the State website at dwd.wisconsin.gov/wc. You can represent yourself at a hearing, however it may be best to hire an attorney as the paperwork and legal process gets complicated, confusing, and difficult to complete. Moreover, injured workers often feel overwhelmed and intimidated having to communicate with the judge and attorney representing the workers compensation carrier. The playing field is equalized when each side has an attorney.
Mays Law Office, Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays has been successfully representing and winning for Wisconsin injured workers for over 25 years. She understands the workers compensation system and will pursue every single benefit for the injured worker. Injured workers are relieved when they learn that they do not have to pay her anything upfront for her representation. Attorney Pierobon Mays gets paid when she gets money for the injured worker. The recovery attorney fee is 20% of such recovery, plus reimbursement for claim expenses.
Once you are healed, or deemed at a healing plateau by your doctor, permanent disability will be considered. If your injury has resulted in a permanent disability, then you will receive a monthly check, often described as PPD. This is not paid in a lump sum but over a period of weeks/months, depending on the location of your injury. Each part of the body has a different number of weeks assigned. For instance, if you doctor assesses 10% permanent disability to your shoulder, this is equal to 10% of 500 weeks or 50 weeks. Very serious injuries like those injuries to the back or head are compensated differently if it involves future wage loss. These types of complex injuries should always involve an attorney representing the injured worker. Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays at Mays Law Office has handled many of these types of complex injury claims.
Call Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays if your injury is so severe and you have concerns that you will never be well enough to return to the same type of employment. Wisconsin law includes benefits that consider scenarios like this called vocational claims. If your injury causes permanent physical restrictions that prevent you from returning to work making the same rate of pay then a claim for retraining, or in some situations, loss of earning capacity may apply. These are valuable but complex claims that require an attorney’s assistance.
While the Wisconsin Workers Compensation System was originally developed to relieve the injured worker from the cost of hiring an attorney, that only applies in a perfect world where the work injury claim has been fully conceded/accepted and the worker is getting ALL the benefits that he is entitled, without argument, delay, or hassle from the workers compensation insurance carrier.
Sadly, rarely does this “Perfect World” happen when a Wisconsin worker is injured. The workers compensation insurance carrier always has an eye out looking for an opportunity to deny the claim, lessen its exposure and responsibility. With that mindset, the insurance company looks for any reason to not pay, delay and ultimately find a reason to deny the claim. These carriers have many tricks up their sleeves to either never pay or stop benefits. They may claim that the injury never occurred at work, or that the injury is personal to the worker, and therefore not related to what happened on the job. Or, they may claim that the worker did not report the injury timely, or that the factual rendition of how the injury occurred is not true. Sometimes, the carrier just ignores the workers and does not even respond to the report of injury and just hopes that the worker will just go away.
Mays Law Office has seen and heard it all from workers compensation insurance carriers. When hiring an attorney, the injured worker needs to make sure that they are choosing an attorney who has years of experience representing injured workers and aggressively advocates to ensure that the worker is getting every benefit they are entitled to under the law.
Even if you are not quite ready to hire an attorney, at the very least, make a call to Mays Law Office for a free consultation to discuss with Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays if you are being treated lawfully by the insurance company and getting every monetary benefit under the law.
Keep in mind that every work injury is different, unique, and requires it owns customized approach. If the timing and circumstances of your claim calls for it, then Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays will invite you to come to her Middleton/Madison office, if convenient, to discuss your claim further. This in-person meeting is still part of the free consultation provided by Mays Law Office. The meeting will last about an hour and half so that all the details of your denied claim can be thoroughly discussed and documented. At the end of this meeting, a well-developed plan will be formalized as to how your workers compensation claim will be pursued. Attorney Pierobon Mays will detail everything that you can expect and will be involved in the injury claim EVERY STEP OF THE WAY. Your claim will NEVER be assigned to another attorney or a paralegal. Every email, phone call, and correspondence will involve Attorney Pierobon Mays.
Attorney Pierobon Mays has been representing Wisconsin injured workers since 1997 – that’s over 25 years of experience fighting and winning. Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays is not intimidated by any Wisconsin employer or workers compensation insurance carrier. See her actual results by doing a simple Google review search. You will see 5 Stars ratings from her actual clients who have found her effective, respected, and aggressive in achieving positive results for them.
Mays Law Office knows that suffering a work injury is scary and intimating but Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays is only a phone call away from answering all of your questions and easing your concerns.
The post FAQs About Wisconsin Workers Compensation appeared first on Mays Law Office.
]]>You were hurt at work and the workers compensation insurance company is denying your benefits claiming that you suffered an IDIOPATHIC injury. What does this mean?
In Wisconsin, the workers compensation system under Chapter 102 of the Wisconsin Statutes provides benefits such as lost time, medical treatment expense, medical mileage reimbursement, and permanent disability to Wisconsin workers who are injured on the job. This system is considered a no-fault system, which means that the injured worker does not need to prove that anyone was at fault for their injuries to receive benefits. Nevertheless, workers compensation insurance companies come up with all kinds of reasons to deny a claim and one of the more common reasons is to claim that the injury is “idiopathic.”
Webster Dictionary defines Idiopathic as “arising spontaneously” or “from an unknown cause.”
Some examples of idiopathic injuries are if an employee faints, suffers a seizure or blacks out due to a personal condition, the resulting injury could be an idiopathic injury. For instance, if an employee’s leg gives out while normally walking or standing at work this might result in an idiopathic injury. Also, if an employee slips and falls while on the job, where there is no object, or residue on the floor to cause the slip, the employee might have sustained an idiopathic injury, which would not be compensable.
While it may be fun to play with this word, and name call it right back on the IDIOT-PATHETIC insurance adjuster who is denying your workers compensation benefits, but in serious, this office is seeing this defense being used more and more against injured Wisconsin workers in the denial of workers compensation benefits.
Perhaps, a better term for this defense is to call it an “unexplained injury” which arises from purely a personal cause, like a disease, physical disability, or a condition personal to the injured worker. To recover workers’ compensation benefits, the employment must place the employee in a position that somehow increases the dangerous effects of a fall.
In the Wisconsin workers compensation setting, idiopathic or unexplained injury cannot be due to a force completely personal to the employee. The easiest example of an idiopathic injury is a heart attack suffered at work. Only under very special circumstances of extreme stress endured on the job, would a heart attack suffered at work be considered a compensable work injury because heart attacks are caused by heart disease, not work events or exposure.
Many Wisconsin injured workers ask how it can be that a fall on-the-job, on their employer’s premises, causing injury excuse the employer’s workers compensation insurance carrier from the responsibility of covering medical treatment and lost time? Such a premise just feels wrong and unfair. Unfortunately, Wisconsin is in the minority of states that does not allow compensation for unexplained or idiopathic falls.
In Wisconsin, slipping on a clean, unobstructed cement/hard floor will not be considered a special hazard of employment and will be deemed idiopathic. However, in Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays’ experience, slip and fall injuries are always more involved than that. Hazards exist that can render what appears idiopathic explainable, such as elevators, stairs, ladders, scaffolds, sharp edges, corners, and water to name a few. Sometimes injured workers do not know or remember what caused their fall and resulting injury because falls happen so fast.
Claims involving potential idiopathic injuries are fact intensive and fact specific, so it is very important for the injured worker to reflect on and timely investigate their fall before documenting or completing an Incident Report of the injury requested by their employer. The workers compensation insurance carrier will use a statement of “I do not know what happened” against the injured worker as a basis to claim Idiopathic injury to deny workers compensation benefits.
In Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays’ experience, a denial of benefits under the idiopathic defense can be overcome when the Wisconsin worker sustains an idiopathic injury that was aggravated or accelerated due to work-related activities. Examples are:
As you can see every injury is fact specific so after a fall that results in an injury, the injured employee should try to document the fall and consider their recollection carefully. Steps to take are:
*Build a timeline and consider your actions and activities before the injury occurred,
*Revisit the scene, take pictures, request surveillance footage,
*Speak to witnesses,
*Retrace your steps to try and determine why and how the fall occurred are all ways to combat a defense of idiopathic injury.
In doing so, the injured worker might learn the reason for their fall. For instance, slippery surfaces caused by spills or leaks, footwear required by the employer, objects on the floor or in the way, fast walking due to rushed work effort or response to an emergency, along with uneven surfaces are often the reason for the fall. Workers without preexisting disabilities generally do not just fall on a clean, dry, smooth surface. There is always more to the story that needs to be flushed out when explaining the circumstances of the injury to the employer and their workers compensation insurance carrier. Moreover, the details of the fall need to be consistent, especially when describing it to medical providers because this is another source of credible documentation.
Lastly, call Attorney Lisa Pierobon Mays so that she can explore the facts and circumstances with you to give further suggestions. Mays Law Office offers free consultations to all Wisconsin injured workers. Mays Law Office has the coveted 5 Star Google rating from their former clients proving that they get results.
The post Idiopathic Defense appeared first on Mays Law Office.
]]>When you get arrested for drunk driving in Wisconsin, it can be tempting to ignore your situation. Dealing with your OWI or PAC ticket can be stressful, and the last way you want to spend your time is meeting with a lawyer and going to court.
But ignoring your OWI or PAC charge is a mistake—and many reasons exist.
It would be best if you did everything you possibly could to protect yourself when you are facing a drunk driving charge in Wisconsin. If you are a first-time offender, you face steep fines, a six to nine-month driver’s license suspension, and other consequences. If you are a repeat offender, the consequences at stake are even more significant—and may even include jail time. Having a conviction on your record will also negatively impact your life for years to come, and in Wisconsin, drunk driving charges are not eligible for expungement.
If this isn’t enough, here are even more reasons not to ignore your Wisconsin OWI or PAC:
Even if you ignore your OWI or PAC case, the court system will. Your case will proceed without you; you will almost certainly be convicted if you do nothing. At this point, the judge will have no choice but to consider the prosecution’s sentencing recommendation, which means that you will most likely face the harshest sentence possible based on the facts of your case.
Also, don’t forget that having an OWI or PAC conviction on your record means you will face even more significant penalties if you get convicted again. Next time, jail time could be on the table, and you could lose your driver’s license for a year or longer.
If you ignore your OWI or PAC charge in Wisconsin, you can also be charged with failure to appear when your court date arrives. The judge can issue a bench warrant for your arrest based on your failure to appear. The judge can also impose additional penalties—and when you eventually make an appearance in court, the judge isn’t going to be sympathetic to your situation.
One of the most important reasons not to ignore your case is that there are several ways to fight OWI and PAC charges in Wisconsin. This is true regardless of whether you were driving drunk at the time of your arrest. An experienced lawyer will be able to evaluate all potential defenses and develop a strategy focused on protecting you to the fullest extent possible. Depending on the circumstances, this could even mean helping you avoid a conviction entirely.
If avoiding a conviction entirely isn’t realistic, your next best option may be to negotiate a reduced charge. Prosecutors will consider plea deals for OWI and PAC charges in appropriate cases. While you will face some consequences if you accept a plea deal, the consequences will be far less severe than those you would face after an OWI or PAC conviction.
Negotiating a favorable plea deal requires experienced legal representation. You need to know what type of deal to seek and be able to negotiate with the prosecutor’s office effectively. This means that you need an experienced lawyer on your side. A lawyer with experience handling OWI and PAC cases in Wisconsin will know how to approach the prosecutor’s office with an offer—and will be able to help ensure that seeking a plea deal is your best option.
Before you consider a plea deal, you should also consider the possibility of having your case diverted. Diversion is an option for many first-time OWI and PAC offenders. If your case is eligible for diversion—and you satisfy the conditions of diversion successfully—you can avoid a conviction regardless of the facts of your case.
For many first-time drunk driving offenders, diversion is the best way to approach their case. If they do what is necessary, they can avoid the life-altering consequences of an OWI or PAC conviction. An experienced lawyer will determine if you qualify; if so, your lawyer will be able to guide you through getting your OWI or PAC charge dismissed.
Given the substantial costs of ignoring an OWI or PAC charge in Wisconsin, hiring an experienced lawyer can be your cheapest option. Whether your lawyer can help you seek diversion, negotiate a plea deal, or fight your charge in court, hiring a lawyer can save you substantial money in the long run.
Finally, if you are facing the life-altering consequences of an OWI or PAC conviction, you owe it to yourself and your family to stand up for your legal rights. Regardless of the facts of your case, you do not deserve to face unnecessary and unjust punishment. From police miscues to prosecutorial misconduct, many issues can lead to an unfair conviction, and under no circumstances should you be willing to accept this as the outcome of your case.
Our lawyers rely on decades of experience to effectively represent individuals facing OWI and PAC charges in Wisconsin. To discuss your case for free with one of our experienced lawyers, call 608-257-0440 or tell us how we can reach you online today.
The post What Happens if You Ignore Your OWI or PAC in Wisconsin? appeared first on Mays Law Office.
]]>